Tiêu chuẩn quốc tế
|
Số hiệu
Standard Number
ISO/IEC DIS 15408-1:2020
Năm ban hành 2020
Publication date
Tình trạng
A - Còn hiệu lực
Status |
|
Tên tiếng Anh
Title in English Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Evaluation criteria for IT security — Part 1: Introduction and general model
|
|
Thay thế cho
Replace |
|
Chỉ số phân loại Quốc tế (ICS)
By field
35.030 - An toàn công nghệ thông tin (bao gồm cả mật mã)
|
|
Số trang
Page 158
Giá:
Price Liên hệ / Contact us
|
|
Phạm vi áp dụng
Scope of standard This document establishes the general concepts and principles of IT security evaluation and specifies the general model of evaluation given by various parts of the standard which in its entirety is meant to be used as the basis for evaluation of security properties of IT products. This document provides an overview of all parts of ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts). It describes the various parts of the standard; defines the terms and abbreviations to be used in all parts of the standard; establishes the core concept of a Target of Evaluation (TOE); describes the evaluation context and describes the audience to which the evaluation criteria is addressed. An introduction to the basic security concepts necessary for evaluation of IT products is given. This document introduces: - the key concepts of Protection Profiles (PP), PP-Modules, PP-Configurations, packages, Security Targets (ST), and conformance types; - a description of the organization of security components throughout the model; - the various operations by which the functional and assurance components given in ISO/IEC 15408-2 and ISO/IEC 15408-3 may be tailored through the use of permitted operations; - general information about the evaluation methods given in ISO/IEC 18045; - guidance for the application of ISO/IEC 15408-4 in order to develop evaluation methods (EM) and evaluation activities (EA) derived from ISO/IEC 18045; - general information about the pre-defined Evaluation Assurance Levels (EALs) defined in ISO/IEC 15408-5; and - information in regard to the scope of evaluation schemes. |